× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. RPG400-L
  3. October 2006

Re: Workaround for 32767-byte and 32767-element limits?

James,


From about V5R1 onwards, the limit for a stand-alone character field and the

full size of a DS was increased from 32767 bytes to 65535 bytes. There was a
point when the SEU syntax checker would complain, but the program would
compile fine (I think on V5R1), but now 6535 is fine.

Sadly, the 32767 array dimension limit still stands :-(

Rory


On 10/2/06, James H H Lampert <jamesl@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


Is there a workaround for the 32767-byte limit on the
length of a character standalone field or DS subfield,
and/or the 32767-element limit on arrays?

I'm asking on behalf of a colleague, and I don't fully
understand myself what the purpose is here, but I believe
they are to be used as some sort of communication buffer.

--
JHHL

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Replies:
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.