|
Scott Klement wrote: > ... > And it expects options(*OMIT), not options(*NOPASS). So please don't sit > here telling me that options(*NOPASS) is okay. It's not. And if you > don't believe me, Barbara Morris (who wrote the article) can confirm what > I say. Or Bruce Vining is who the guy in charge of APIs for IBM can > confirm it. I'm confident that they'll agree that you can't (legally) use > options(*NOPASS) with the CEEDOD API. > Yep, absolutely I confirm it. Same with any CEE API - OPTIONS(*NOPASS) is never valid for these APIs.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.