|
Yea, I failed to mention that I was posting for a colleague and I just pasted his text into the post. He is using SQLRPGLE. This is static SQL. I have suggested that he try adding the select/omit logic from his logical to the where clause, thinking that this might help give the optimizer a better clue as to what he is trying to do. He has written it in record level access and it runs in about the same total time. The 25% time lost while the optimizer churns would be a big boost if we could recover it. Does the access plan not get stored with the *pgm object? KC On 3/30/06, Michael_Schutte@xxxxxxxxxxxx <Michael_Schutte@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Kyle, You mentioned that you are using SQLRPG, can I assume that you meant > SQLRPGLE? If not, try converting the code to SQLRPGLE. I have a program > that I prepare a statement and depending on the user selection, I pick > which file that needs to be used in the SQL statement. > > For example, if the user chooses to search the employee master by last > name, I chose a logical file that has the last name as the first part of > the key. If user chooses company and department, then I choose a logical > file that has company and department first. My processing time in this > program went from 5 minutes to 10 seconds. > > Something in the WHERE statement is causing SQL to search for a better > file. > > You could always not write it in SQL... Then you will not have to worry > about it. > > Michael Schutte > Work 614-492-7419 > email michael_schutte@xxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > "Kyle Collie" > <kcollie@xxxxxxxx > m> To > Sent by: "RPG List" <rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > rpg400-l-bounces@ cc > midrange.com > Subject > Embedded SQL Logical file use > 03/29/2006 06:41 > PM > > > Please respond to > RPG programming > on the AS400 / > iSeries > <rpg400-l@midrang > e.com> > > > > > > > We have an SQLRPG module that is opening a cursor based on a S/O > logical. Everytime the program is run the query optimizer is checking > for a better file to use and is eventually just coming back and using > the initial S/O logical that we specified in the select statement. Is > there a way to force the logical and prevent that processing time that > is wasted when it tries to find a better index? > > The time it takes up is about 1 minute 20 seconds. > > Thanks in advance, > > -- > This is the RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries (RPG400-L) mailing list > To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, > visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l > or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx > Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives > at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l. > > > > -- > This is the RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries (RPG400-L) mailing list > To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, > visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l > or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx > Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives > at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l. > >
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.