|
Would we have the same results if the code had been: D CollSO_DS DS D CollTxt 60 DIM(5) D CollCode and used CollTxt(n) instead of CollTxt1 through CollTxt5? Mel Rothman wrote:
What makes this confusing, I think, is that it used "from - to" to define the fields' positions instead of lengths and the overlay keyword.I would have coded it like this: D CollSO_DS DS D CollCode 3 D CollTxt1 60 D CollTxt2 60 D CollTxt3 60 D CollTxt4 60 D CollTxt5 60 D CollTxt 60 DIM(5) overlay(CollSO_DS:4) Mel Rothman Mel Rothman, Inc. Booth Martin wrote:D CollSO_DS DS D CollTxt 60 DIM(5) D CollTxt1 1 60 D CollTxt2 61 120 D CollTxt3 121 180 D CollTxt4 181 240 D CollTxt5 241 300 D CollCode 301 303 This is confusing me. What are these lines of code doing? How long is the data structure CollSO? What happens if I increase the DIM from 5 to 10?
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.