|
Perhaps I need a little education in business acumen, but if one believes that a faster PC is worth it, and is cost justifiable because "Jim" can justify a new $1,500 computer because his productivity will increase to the point where that is paid for in 2 months", then, why can't you justify X times $1,500 because X programmers productivity will be increased to the point where that is still paid for in 2 months? Is it because a midlevel IT manager can sign an expense chit for $1,500 but not for X times $1,500? Piece it out over several months? I've heard of mainframe purchases being done that way. Rob Berendt
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.