Re: SrvPgms and Change Management

Fleming, Greg (ED) wrote:
>>Yep, you're missing something. <grin>
> Yes, but is what I'm missing better change management software, or just
> mental clarity ? 

No comment <grin>.

> I tried that with Implementer, but it automatically tried to recompile
> the program which uses the module, and failed.  

Why did the compile fail?  Our compile interface is pretty good when it
comes to reconstructing the compile command necessary to build an object.

> I'll have to see if the binder source thing can be used with
> Implementer.

Binder source works quite well with Implementer.  We use extensively
internally.

> Anyone else out there using Implementer?  I see Kimaly has chimed in
> with what may be the death knell for my hopes of accomplishing this with
> Implementer, although there may be a glimmer of hope yet in the fact
> that her info is apparently second hand.  Anyone out there made this
> work with IM ?  Or can anyone confirm Kimaly's report ?  

I can confirm that Implementer works quite well in the scenario you
described.

At this point, I would suggest you contact our support group again ...
it sounds like there might be a setup problem that needs to be resolved.

david
(who works for MKS as well as running the lists)

p.s. This topic REALLY belongs in MIDRANGE-L.