× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. RPG400-L
  3. July 2005

Re: READC, dou, and For

Holden Tommy wrote:
> 
> my 2 coppers...
> 
> if the SFLSIZ is greater than SFLPAG I prefer the READC & SFLNXTCHG (less 
> records to process....999 records in a SFL think about it....)
> 
> SFLSIZ=SFLPAG I always use loop processing.  I really don't think there is 
> going to be much difference in performance between a FOR loop & a DO 
> loop...under the covers the compiler most likely generates almost identical 
> code(just my guess here maybe Barbara can chime in on this..)
> 

Right, the generated code would be similar if not identical.  I wouldn't
use performance as a consideration when choosing between DO and FOR.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Replies:
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.