|
How is 10I0 more clear than 4I0 Vs. 32I 0 ??? I agree the IBM docs are screwy, aggressively inconsistent (Bin(4) Binary(4) Int8, etc.). What my point is/was is that RPG programmers would more readily comprehend 4I0 rather than 10I0. That's all. -----Original Message----- From: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Joel Fritz Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2005 12:08 PM To: RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries Subject: RE: Making sense of 4-byte binary fields -----Original Message----- From: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Scott Klement Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2005 9:24 AM To: RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries Subject: RE: Making sense of 4-byte binary fields > A poor design decision on IBM's part was in requiring the Integer data > type to be coded as 3I, 5I, 10I or 20I is the root of the problem. It > should have been 1I, 2I, 4I, and 8I. IBM could add this capability > without impacting existing code--and it would make things much easier > to comprehend by those still using the "B" data type. I don't buy this argument! Your whole argument is that the RPG language should've been designed to fit the API documentation. Everywhere else, they refer to "32-bit integers" and "16-bit integers". The API docs are the only place I've seen this referred to by a number of bytes instead of bits. Should the RPG team have done this, instead? D myNum s 32I 0 Actually, that way makes more sense if you think about it. All RPG fields (except float) are declared according to the number of digits that fit in them. Since these are binary fields, 32 is the number of binary digits that are stored in them. (Indeed, "bit" is short for "binary digit") In Windows, 16-bit integers are referred to as "words", and 32-bit integers are called "double words". Maybe they should've made it look like this? D myNum s WI D myNum s DI Personally, I think the method they chose (specifying the number of digits) is as good as any other method. It's probably better, since RPG programmers have always defined their fields according to the number of decimal digits stored in them. IMHO, it's the API documentation that throws everyone off. -- I think you have a good point about the misleading documentation. Most other languages specify the integer types by names--e.g. short, int, long...and leave the number of bits to the implementation. Fortunately, it's mostly standardized. I still find myself calculating the number of bits in an API 4 B to figure out what to use in RPG. (I know, I should have memorized it by now.) It's a matter of what you learned first. I was taught to think of maximum number you can use in a given signed integer type as 2^(number_of_bits -1). It makes sense that someone who came up in RPG would find it easier to think in terms of digits. One caveat is that 3i 0 doesn't go up to 999 and likewise for the other integer types. I still count on my fingers sometimes to find the number of bytes in a packed field. <g> It's no worse than having to deal with passing other data types that don't exist in RPG to another language. We probably need the DWIM paramater passing convention. ***************************** NOTICE: All e-mail sent to or from this e-mail address will be received or otherwise recorded by The Sharper Image corporate e-mail system and is subject to archival, monitoring, and review by and/or disclosure to Sharper Image security and other management. This message is intended only for the use of the addressee and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. The contents of this message may contain personal views which are not the views of The Sharper Image. If you are not the intended recipient, dissemination of this communication is prohibited. ***************************** -- This is the RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries (RPG400-L) mailing list To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.