× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



You know, I probably didn't make myself clear.  I had this idea on my way
into work, and I was excited, and probably blathering...

 

What I want to do is this:

 

When you CHAIN to a file, the found record is placed, field by field, in the
input buffer (the fields contained in the record format).  

 

Example, if you have a file 

 

R Trans

   Tracro  3A

   Trfam# 9P 0

K Tracro 3A

 

And you have this file specified as an update file, you then have the
following fields available to your module

Tracro

Trfam#

 

When you do a CHAIN to the TRANS format/file, and a record is found, the two
fields above now contain the values from the record found by the CHAIN.
_This_ is the action I am trying to avoid.  I thought if you specify a DS on
the CHAIN operation, that the DS would be updated, but the two fields above
would not be.  

 

Tony Carolla

MedAmerica Billing Services, Inc.

 


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.