Re: Subroutines vs Subprocedures was RE: Indicators

[Eduard Sluis <eduard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Buck,

No your post was not academic.
It was the recognizable and reasonable one and in that way I think
reflects in the best way our ever occurring dilemma's on how and what
to use best in what situation. 
That's why at last I lost the fight not to react.

regards,
Eduard Sluis 

--- Buck Calabro <buck.calabro@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Eduard Sluis wrote:
> 
> > Buck Calabro wrote:
> >
> > > One thing is certain; this thread has made me think and re-think
> > > about why I write the way I do.
> >
> > And did you change the way you do because of the discussion??
> > I still have not seen good reasons for that.
> 
> Hi Eduard!
> I haven't had time to yet!  But I don't think I will, because my
> current style is clear enough to mo co-workers.  The biggest reason
> is
> that I want to stay as close to 'one procedure, one function' as
> possible.
> 
> > This discussion had rapidly reached academic
> > levels
> 
> Perhaps you are right.  I hope my posts weren't academic-only.  I
> tried to show a real world example of why I still use subroutines for
> some tasks.
> Regards,
>   --buck
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> This is the RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries (RPG400-L) mailing
> list
> To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
> or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.
> 
> 


=====
Implement-It,
Pos Cabai OfficePark unit 2,
Willemstad, Curaçao,
Netherlands Antilles.

Cell: 5999 5618980 Tel: 5999 7372031 Fax 5999 7372048