|
Eduard Sluis wrote: > Buck Calabro wrote: > > > One thing is certain; this thread has made me think and re-think > > about why I write the way I do. > > And did you change the way you do because of the discussion?? > I still have not seen good reasons for that. Hi Eduard! I haven't had time to yet! But I don't think I will, because my current style is clear enough to mo co-workers. The biggest reason is that I want to stay as close to 'one procedure, one function' as possible. > This discussion had rapidly reached academic > levels Perhaps you are right. I hope my posts weren't academic-only. I tried to show a real world example of why I still use subroutines for some tasks. Regards, --buck
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.