× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



On Wed, 2004-08-18 at 15:50, Michael Naughton wrote:
> I've tried to stop using indicators, too, but sometimes they just seem
> really handy. The other day, I came across a situation where I just
> couldn't see _not_ using them. I wanted to test two 8,0 fields to see if
> they held valid date values, based on either *ISO or *USA format, and if
> either one of them was bad I wanted to set an error flag.

> which is a difference of 16 lines instead of 9. Is there a better way to
> do it? Or is there some other reason why avoiding indicators in this case
> is "better"? I fully agree that in many (most?) situations there are
> better ways, but "most" is not "all", and I'm not sure that indicators
> won't remain useful in the future. . . .

This was a real stretch for me (going back to fixed-format), but here is
what I came up with:

d testDate        s               d   inz

c                   monitor
c                   if        PRMFMT = '*YYMD'
c                   eval      testDate = %date( PRMSDT : *ISO )
c                   eval      testDate = %date( PRMEDT : *ISO )
c                   elseif    PRMFMT = '*MDYY'
c                   eval      testDate = %date( PRMSDT : *USA )
c                   eval      testDate = %date( PRMEDT : *USA )
c                   endif
c                   on-error
c                   eval      PRMERR = *ON
c                   endmon

This solution ends up at 11 lines and a new variable.  Of course, the
number of lines doesn't really matter, but it is comparable to the 9 you
mentioned before.

> Am I missing something?

You are missing readability, which is also the number one offering of
/free, but is that underwhlems you then I'm not sure what to say. I'm
not trying to dig at you or suggest that you need to switch to /free,
just that if you don't at least acknowledge the readability of things
like /free and the PITA factor of things like left-hand indicators, then
we are at an impasse.  

> (PS: don't bother telling me that when I switch to /free I won't be able
> to use indicators. I know that. If I'm forced to switch, I'll give up
> indicators, but IMHO that's not a good reason. So far, I find the benefits
> of /free underwhelming, and I'm a guy who has done a fair amount of
> programming in Visual Basic and DIBOL -- both very free-format.)

You won't be able to use RESULTING indicators, but you can still use
indicators if you really want to.  


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.