|
>You're too young to remember much about EDI, but EDI was once touted as the great inter-machine communication method. Actually, I have a chunk of EDI x.12 experience. I played a major role in implementing our first go at Harbinger (now Inovus). Now that you know that, does that change your opinion about me? I didn't think so. . . ;-) The problems you stated aren't with XML it is with the organizations that use them. I think we are on the verge of getting some nice tools to process XML so we don't even necessarily know that XML is involved. Sadly RPG will never see these tools implemented well into the language. >350 characters of overhead for a simple SOAP message? I think you miss the point of XML. You aren't just trading up 50 characters for 350 characters without any benefit, you are getting much more functionality and flexibility with many more technologies built on an around it. Are some of technologies difficult to use? Most definitely, but it is the start of a new way to communicate (and yes I know that the XML concept isn't new, I have researched since the last time we had this discussion :-). >XML and particularly SOAP are not the universal panacea. I agree. But where used correctly, XML can be much more appealing solution than others that claim to work just as well. We had the discussion of sending an entire PO to a CGI RPG program in Form variables in the WEB400 forum last year sometime. Can that be done? Yes. Is it more messy than XML? Definitely. Will it scale in the future? Not very well. XML is not the end all, but it definitely can play a role in most peoples organizations. I don't care to move this over to WEB400 if you are just going to argue about 350 bytes going over a communication line. If that is what we are going to talk about I am fine with not talking, because I have beat that horse before :-) Aaron Bartell -----Original Message----- From: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Joe Pluta Sent: Monday, March 22, 2004 5:08 PM To: 'RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries' Subject: RE: RPG as a Web Service Consumer > From: Bartell, Aaron L. (TC) > > I think you are unfairly calling XML "clumsy" when in all actuality it is > so powerful that it can adhere to almost any situation as far as data > transport and config files go. Folks, you might want to move this philosophical discussion to another place. I vote for WEB400-L myself. But in the meantime, Aaron, one little remark: XML is simply an encoding method, inherently no better or worse than any other. You're too young to remember much about EDI, but EDI was once touted as the great inter-machine communication method. The problem with any such standard is that it quickly gets bloated with lots of garbage. At least EDI has a standards body; the XML community is far less organized than that and it shows in the XML conventions. 350 characters of overhead for a simple SOAP message? Most of which is essentially the same for every message? That's downright silly. XML and particularly SOAP are not the universal panacea. Joe _______________________________________________ This is the RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries (RPG400-L) mailing list To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.