|
> From: Bartell, Aaron L. (TC) > > I think you are unfairly calling XML "clumsy" when in all actuality it is > so powerful that it can adhere to almost any situation as far as data > transport and config files go. Folks, you might want to move this philosophical discussion to another place. I vote for WEB400-L myself. But in the meantime, Aaron, one little remark: XML is simply an encoding method, inherently no better or worse than any other. You're too young to remember much about EDI, but EDI was once touted as the great inter-machine communication method. The problem with any such standard is that it quickly gets bloated with lots of garbage. At least EDI has a standards body; the XML community is far less organized than that and it shows in the XML conventions. 350 characters of overhead for a simple SOAP message? Most of which is essentially the same for every message? That's downright silly. XML and particularly SOAP are not the universal panacea. Joe
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.