RE: FW: Have you seen this? An improved way.

Well, for one thing, if you pass a data structure to a subprocedure as a
parameter, the opdesc's CEEDOD API does not return the correct value.

-----Original Message-----
From: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Simon Coulter
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2004 4:03 PM
To: RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries
Subject: Re: FW: Have you seen this? An improved way.


On Tuesday, February 24, 2004, at 03:21  PM, Bob Cozzi wrote:

> Remember OPDESC don't work properly prior to V5R1 when you have a parm 
> in
> the list of parms that is CONST.

What do you mean? I've been using Operational Descriptors since 440 in 
conjunction with CONST, *OMIT, and *NOPASS and had no trouble using 
them. What specific problems did you encounter?

Regards,
Simon Coulter.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
    FlyByNight Software         AS/400 Technical Specialists

    http://www.flybynight.com.au/
    Phone: +61 3 9419 0175   Mobile: +61 0411 091 400        /"\
    Fax:   +61 3 9419 0175                                   \ /
                                                              X
                  ASCII Ribbon campaign against HTML E-Mail  / \
--------------------------------------------------------------------


_______________________________________________
This is the RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries (RPG400-L) mailing list
To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.