|
Hello all, If the driving force behind the RPG enhancements of the past few years (procedures, prototypes, long field names, qualified data structures, etc) is to allow RPG coders to better and more easily write readable and maintainable code, then why on Earth would anyone want to go back to the practice of using obscure and obtuse 'shortcut op codes'? Pick one: 1) I am such a fast typist that those extra characters really decrease my productivity, 2) I'm being environmentally sensitive by having my CRT display fewer pixels - which equals less electricity, 3) I have job security because no one else in the office can understand what I write 4) I get personal satisfaction out of pretending to be a 'C' programmer. Have I missed any? JK > date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 12:05:13 -0500 > from: Hans Boldt <boldt@xxxxxxxxxx> > subject: Re: Shorthand Syntax (was XFoot with Qualified DS's) > > RJoubert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > Greetings to the list. > > > > Has someone created or compiled a list of all the new shorthand syntax's > > yet? > > > > If so, can we get to it somehow? > > > > Thanks > > > > a += b; > a -= b; > a *= b; > a /= b; > a **= b; > > Done! > > Cheers! Hans
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.