× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. RPG400-L
  3. November 2003

Re: XFoot with Qualified DS's

M. Lazarus wrote:

At 11/25/03 08:57 AM, you wrote:

+= is a good thing to remember. Much like the optional factor 1 in the ADD op code.


Does anyone think that the shorthand syntax is a little backwards?
It replaces this format: X = X + 1 with X += 1. Shouldn't it be X =+ 1? It's a little easier to visualize putting the X in between the = and + than having to reverse it.


I realize that C and it's derivatives do it that way, I just think that it's a little odd. JMHO.

Hans, would it be possible to have the compiler handle both ways?

-mark

Interesting question. Apparently, the first version of C actually implemented it as "x=+1;". It was quickly changed to "x+=1;" when it was realized that the former had a another and more common interpretation.

(If it's still not obvious what the issue is, think of the difference between "x=-1;" and "x-=1;", and consider that the former was allowed in the RPG IV language long before the latter was.)

Cheers! Hans



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Follow-Ups:
Replies:
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.