|
<We are not allowed to use free format either.> >>Because not everyone will understand them..." I am curious, how many other programmer's besides Joe here are stuck in a shop where they only allow you to code to the lowest denominator? It's a battle that I have fought several times before. I believe it is part of our _job_ to continue to learn the best way to code for the job at hand. RPGIV is a must - let RPGII die. Of course, that won't happen until the big ERP vendors allow it to (see JDE). Funny that most people still consider RPGIV the "new style" when it's been available for over a decade now! There is a time and a place for everything "new" that RPGIV has to offer - sub-procedures, service programs, /free, nested data structures, etc. Unfortunately, I think that the majority of iSeries RPG programmers agree that we need to code so that others will be able to understand it. Why not code in a way that will allow the lowest denominators to learn something and allow them to grow their own skill set? I realize that I'm most likely preaching to the choir here on this list... Am I? Bob Cagle IT Manager Lynk, Inc. 8241 Melrose Drive Lenexa, KS 66214
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.