|
True enough, however, unless and until the work is registered in the U.S. Copyright office, the worse that could happen is they make you remove it from being posted on your website--so you simply add the link the their website (and the source) and you're done. There is also case history with regards to posting something in the public as far as use is concerned. But I don't believe the UC folks care about its usage, they simply want accreditation; and I believe that's all Scott was trying to say. Bob Cozzi Cozzi Consulting www.rpgiv.com -----Original Message----- From: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Buck Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 4:44 PM To: rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: strsep sourc > If you own the license in one language, you own it in all of them. > Same thing applies for different platforms. I am not a lawyer but have had some...experience in this area. One copyrites a written work. One patents an idea. This is the basis of intellectual property law in the US. One cannot patent a common idea like addition. One CAN copyright a written work containing addition, such as a math textbook. Copyrighting a math textbook in English does not automatically grant me copyright status to all math textbooks in all languages. Computer programs are copyrighted works and are considered by US law to be written works like novels. Scott's comments about derivative works comes from the idea that you can't copy pages from my copyrighted math textbook, publish it with a new cover and call it your own. Nor can you change the occasional word here and there and call it your own. Such uses are called derivative works, because you basically derived your work from mine. How much you are allowed to copy is a very grey area, but if it's more than a movie review's worth, you're probably liable. If you can afford the court fees, feel free to copy away and deal with the lawyers. Dealing strictly with code, if you were to rewrite this C code as RPG IV, you would probably not be subject to US copyright problems, despite the fact that you derived your work from The Regents of the University of California. That's because your work does not look like theirs. You may be violating a patent they hold on the algorithm (the idea of how they did it) which makes the whole discussion even more complicated. This 'translating' issue is a grey area, and the courts have decided both ways on the issue. The point is that it depends on how much of the style/look moves from the original work into the derived work. If it's theoretically possible to automate such a translation, you're probably liable. Again, if you have the time, money and curiosity, feel free to test the legal waters to your heart's content. Scott's point that if you don't care for the BSD licence terms makes a great deal of sense. Design your own algorithm and implement it your own way. How would you like some lawyer to take away ALL of your company's software because you didn't abide by some piddly technicality? That is what they get paid to do. And before I get pooh-poohed about it not being likely, think of it like this: A disgruntled co-worker might turn in the company some time in the future, and the lawyer will use posts from public archives to show a repeated pattern of abuse/disrespect for copyright/patent law. The Regents don't have to come looking for you; they may never even care. But a lawyer can smell money a long way off, and cases like this are easy pickings. It matters not one whit how sensible this seems to you. That's the way it is, and the US Congress just amended the copyright laws to extend the copyright terms, so they don't seem inclined to make changes that ease copyright restrictions. I have no idea how non-US copyright laws work; you'd have to consult the Berne Convention for some details on that legal quagmire. I served as an 'expert witness' in such a case. The company is bankrupt. By the way, an 'expert witness' doesn't have to be very expert to serve in that capacity. And the violation doesn't need to be severe for the legal system to destroy you. Take Scott's advice. If you want to use their free code, follow their rules. If you don't want to follow their rules, design it yourself and avoid the legal entanglements. I'm sorry for the ramble, but this one is a personal bugaboo. I saw what something trivial did to a company first hand, and would hate to hear that someone here was caught in a similar noose. --buck _______________________________________________ This is the RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries (RPG400-L) mailing list To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.