RE: Why CODE instead of LPEX?

["Bob cozzi" <cozzi@xxxxxxxxx>]

I believe CODE will be incorporated into WDSc (Eclipse) over time. The big
issue is converting CODE's code to the Java compatible SDK that Eclipse
uses.


Bob Cozzi
Cozzi Consulting
www.rpgiv.com

-----Original Message-----
From: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Chevalier, Rick
Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2003 7:47 AM
To: RPG400 Mailing List (E-mail)
Subject: Why CODE instead of LPEX?

There have been several recent posts urging the use of CODE/400 for
developers beginning their foray into the world of alternate development
tools for the iSeries.  I may regret asking but I have a question.  Let me
start by saying I have nothing against CODE.  I only recently had the
opportunity to use it and I have no complaints although I prefer to use the
LPEX editor in WDSc 5.0.  The designer is taking a little longer however.
My question is this; why the push towards CODE when IBM has stated that it
will be replaced by the LPEX editor in WDSc?  Am I misunderstanding IBM's
intent?  It seems to me resources would be better spent on learning the
tools that will replace CODE rather than learning something with a limited
life span.

Rick
_______________________________________________
This is the RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries (RPG400-L) mailing list
To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.