|
<snip> However, I'm not quite sure how the 'best choice' an index is selected by the SQL engine. I've noticed that it will create an index of its own if it doesn't suit the engine's purpose, even if I want the engine to use an particular index that exists. More or less it says in the joblog that the cost is too expensive to use the existing one <snip> The SQL optimizer will start with the where clause when identifying which index to use and then (IIRC) move to the join clause. I have never seen it use a DDS logical with select omit criteria. Rearranging the sequence of your where clause can make a dramatic difference in performance. <snip> Now I want to add some more to the question. What about joining files to get one/several record(s)? Is SQL a choice that can be considered or is RPG still a better choice? <snip> You might want to try an SQL view. This would essentially be a select statement joining all your files together and optionally containing selection criteria. It can be read in an RPG program the same as a regular physical or logical file. Two issues to consider however; The SQL statement describing the view is run each time the view is initially accessed and the view cannot be sequenced. If you want the records read in a specific sequence you will need a select statement over the view to order the returned records. HTH, Rick
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.