|
Mark, 1) I am not talking about new developers in rpg, but the existing ones. Lots of them uses rpg and opensource tools. Integration can be the key here.... 2) I agree with you. Its indeed proprietary to IBM. Can IBM create linkage classes to maintain this? Probably they wont. 3) I think this will be a big challange. If you take babyRpg for instants, its been tried. Unsuccesfull unfortunately. 4) that can be somekind of service to maintain the latest version. I am still convinced, that there is a possibillity of creating an opensource version of RPG. But IBM needs to reviel there API calling structure in order to create a linkage library for the different platforms. I do understand that this is difficult and I think that IBM rather not reviel this information. I also think that this is wishfull thinking of having an opensource rpg language. Henk. -----Original Message----- From: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of M. Lazarus Sent: Sunday, May 04, 2003 5:51 PM To: RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries Subject: RE: open source rpg compiler Henk, steve, At 5/4/03 06:29 AM, you wrote: >Sorry... here I disagree. I know a lot of people, who like me, favors >opensource. When the rpg-ile compiler becomes opensource, we can >crossplatform this language. This opens perspectives. I think that >supporting the rpg-ile to opensource is the way to go. It will keep the >language alive. 1) There has to be general interest in the RPG language to begin with. There seems to be very little of that outside of the existing Midrange community. RPG is perceived to be a dinosaur - not a "cool" language. Making it open source will NOT change that. 2) The RPG ILE compiler (even if it is only in the "linkage" portion, several steps past the parser portion) is closely linked to "ILE technology", which is proprietary to IBM. This means that the details of that process would have to be opened up to the public. If that doesn't happen (and there's no benefit for IBM to make that happen), the product would be pretty much useless to the general public. 3) I think that the language and testing tools are written in a proprietary language, which would be pretty much useless to the general public. 4) I believe that we would end up w/ a bunch of non-standard plug-in libraries, instead of an across the board standard that we can rely on. I for one don't want to have to make sure that I have the latest library plug-in every time a feature is needed. As much as I would like features to quickly and magically appear in the language, I think that we would lose a lot more by making it open source. -mark _______________________________________________ This is the RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries (RPG400-L) mailing list To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/rpg400-l or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.