|
"Mackie, Roger L. (Precision Press)" wrote: > > Aaron, > > In my limited experience subprocedure fields with the VARYING keyword, > adding VALUE or CONST does not produce the expected results. Maybe Barbara > could tell us why. If you get it to work, please be sure to share it with > the list. > In my experience, using VALUE or CONST with VARYING works ok. If you try to look at the data beyond the current length you might see what looks like garbage, but your program wouldn't be seeing that unless you were using some overlays to go beyond the "valid" data.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.