|
> From: James Rich > > You don't have to debug. Just recompile your code. But what you are > talking about is rewriting your code in free form. So you consider the move from RPG IV to freeform to be a "higher order" mvoe than the move from RPG III to RPG IV? I don't. RPG IV gave us procedures and ILE support, a truly new paradigm for the language, which to my mind is more than anything freeform gives us. To me, freeform is far more a syntactical change than an functional change. Perhaps I'm mistaken. Perhaps freeform RPG is a bifurcation of the language. If it is, then IBM should call it a new language, and had better plan on supporting both syntaxes FOREVER. Do you think that's the case? Remember, this is the company that told everyone to use WebSphere, but if you're runnning on Standard Edition you can't upgrade to V5R2 because V5R2 specifically does not support 3.5SE. This is the company that told everyone to use Visual Age for Java, then dumped it for Eclipse. > So I guess I think > that option 3 (a mix of free form and non) is the only way to go. I don't > see why that seems unacceptable? Gawd, man, have you no decency? Twice the syntax knowledge required. Twice the programming ability. If I have a programmer who doesn't know freeform, they can't fix the programs written in freeform. Any manager will tell you the LAST thing he wants today is to have to add yet another syntax to the mix. Joe
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.