× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Hello Bill,

You wrote:
>Rating the items on the entire list would be extreme.  If we were told to
>rate our top 10, someone would gripe that we should have been allowed to
>select 15.  The line has to be drawn somewhere, but I don't think any one
>item should be rated at more that 50% of our budget.

I've said it before and I'll say it again.  I would spend my entire $100
on Procedure overloading.  I would be extremely happy if we got that
enhancement **EVEN** if it were the **ONLY** enhancement in that release.

It's probably too late to say this but when choosing the items you want
Toronto to implement please give consideration to how much effort the
enhancement will save you.  If it saves you very little then vote for
something else.  It seems to me (based on the results of the previous
survey) that most voters choose trivial enhancements that they could write
themselves.  For example, from the current survey:

        #7 New BIFs %TESTD, %TESTT, %TESTZ -- can easily be implemented by
wrapping TEST(D), TEST(T), and TEST(Z) op-codes in a procedure.

        #19 Option to edit negative numbers -- again a procedure can
handle this.  Write it once and forget it.

Even complex items such as:

        #8 Allow dynamic resizing of arrays and MODS

        #12 Multi-dimensional arrays

can be handled by a decent set of procedures.

I suggest that our votes go for things that cannot be implemented by user
code (such as %offset, or pointer indirection, or alias support, #23, or
#31, etc.)

Other trivial things like #21, #26, #27, and #32 shouldn't even require a
vote from us because they should have been part of the original
implementation therefore they should just get done since they are design
flaws.

My point is that we should be choosing things that dramatically improve
the language and capabilities of RPG IV rather than have Toronto squander
development dollars on trivial enhancements that can be implemented by
user code.

Regards,
Simon Coulter.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
   FlyByNight Software         AS/400 Technical Specialists
   http://www.flybynight.com.au/

   Phone: +61 3 9419 0175   Mobile: +61 0411 091 400        /"\
   Fax:   +61 3 9419 0175   mailto: shc@flybynight.com.au   \ /
                                                             X
                 ASCII Ribbon campaign against HTML E-Mail  / \
--------------------------------------------------------------------



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.