Re: Error in the EVAL Statement?

--
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]


Jon, at a seminar G Farr spoke of    C  Eval   Inx = ++  being the same as
Inx = inz+1

I am sure I have that wrong, but there was some thing he was showing us.

---------------------------------------------------------
Booth Martin   http://www.MartinVT.com
Booth@MartinVT.com
---------------------------------------------------------

-------Original Message-------

From: rpg400-l@midrange.com
Date: Saturday, August 03, 2002 22:15:47
To: rpg400-l@midrange.com
Subject: Error in the EVAL Statement?

>> Yes, it is valid. The first + is the "continuation indicator"


I'm sorry but you are incorrect. There is no such thing as continuation
characters in C specs other than to continue a literal.

In the example given as Jim has pointed out - the compiler treats it as
indicating a positive literal. It will apparently also work this way with a
variable name. If however you code 3 + signs in a row you'll see an error.
Note that because spaces are not significant in expressions the + and the
literal/variable can be separated by a space/

Jon Paris
Partner400


_______________________________________________
This is the RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries (RPG400-L) mailing list
To post a message email: RPG400-L@midrange.com
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@midrange.com
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.


.
--
[ Content of type image/gif deleted ]
--