|
Hi Tom, This is a thread that has run it's course, and I don't think there is any real interest in opening up the debate again. I will only go so far as to say that the specifics of the GPL license are available to all at www.gnu.org. To those contemplating the use of GPL code within an application, I believe it is their responsibility to inform the application copyright holder of those intentions, and to provide them with a copy of the GPL, so that they may make an informed decision. This is not a technology decision, it is a business/legal decision which may have significant consequences, and therefore needs to be considered carefully by the corporate stewardship. Regards, John Taylor ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tom Liotta" <thomas@inorbit.com> > > > *MOST* shops use code, they don't redistribute it. > > > > But are they prepared to say that they'd *never* distribute it? And to > > fundamentally give up their right to ever do so by using GPL code for some > > simple purpose, like accessing IFS files? > > To me, the issue is with the wording you're using. I cannot see that the use of GPL code translates into *never* being able to distribute a package. > > Simply remove the GPL code, replace it with your own before distributing. Who wouldn't do that? >
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.