× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



I *definitely* need more than one file in CLP.  That is the main reason,
IMO, to just forget about CLP and write it in RPG.  Otherwise I wind up with
3 CLPs calling each other because I need 3 files open.

Better CLP File I/O would be nice too.  (readp, setll type calls).

Am I upset with DDS .vs. SQL?  I use DDS to define files, I *never* use SQL.
When you can only do something in SQL in a file definition it leaves me out
of the loop.

Yes, file update in CLP would be *great*.

I haven't use much embedded SQL in CLP so couldn't say.

Regards,

Jim Langston

-----Original Message-----
From: M. Lazarus [mailto:mlazarus@ttec.com]

<SNIP>

  Some items to get things started:

-  Are you upset w/ the direction IBM has taken regarding DDS vs. SQL?
-  Do you need more than one file defined in CLP?
-  Do you need to be able to update files within CLP?
-  Are you fighting w/ embedded SQL, due to precompiler restrictions?



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.