× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



How are you supposed to know the maximum size you need, Barbara?  The main
reason people (or I anyway) use Malloc in the first place is cause they have
no idea how much memory they are going to need.

Regards,

Jim Langston

-----Original Message-----
From: bmorris@ca.ibm.com [mailto:bmorris@ca.ibm.com]

>From: MWalter@hanoverwire.com
>Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2002 10:44:55 -0400
>
>My question is regarding dynamically allocating storage. Say you have an
>array defined as based and dimensioned with 1000 elements. Can you
allocate
>more than the 1000 elements or is that the limit?

Mark, you can allocate as much as you want (within the system's limits).
ALLOC doesn't know or care what you're going to use the pointer for.

But you can only get to the first 1000 elements using RPG's array(x)
syntax.  If you wanted to get to the next 1000 elements, you'd have to
move the pointer.  (If you do this, make sure you save the original pointer
so you can deallocate the storage.)

But why would you want to allocate more than you define?  Why not just
define it with the maximum size you need?

Barbara Morris


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.