|
Rick Baird wrote: >for your 3rd test, do you mean the >non-blank statement was longer than 80? >or less than 80 but it had half before >and half after the 80th column? The latter. >What did the compile listing look like? >did it do line wrapping or some >such to show the free code? No, it truncated at column 100, so for a statement that began at column 101 all the listing shows is a blank line. Not that email will preserve the formatting, but here's the failing third test: 000043 c/free 020314 000043 000044 if %parms > 1; B01 020314 000044 000045 decPoint = %subst(de 020314 000045 000046 comma = %subst(decComma : 2 : 1); 01 020314 000046 000047 endif; E01 020314 000047 It's pretty clear that the listing is intended to work with the 'new' 112 byte record length, where there are 100 columns of source data. This is a pretty broad hint that the recommended record length is the one to use... --buck
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
