|
David, I understand the subtle point that you are making, which is (correct me if I'm wrong) that as a commercial software provider I can not include GPL software within my product, but can point out that there is an open source dependency that must be included in the overall installation for my software product to work. And I can provide that software, for a fee, as a part of my installation package. Is this a fair understanding of what you stated? If so, you need to read the GPL again. The GPL specifically states that if any GPL module or code snippet is used that the entire product MUST be GPL. It's not just modification of, but also includes use of. But then again, lawyers make their income by the splitting of hairs. As John pointed out, the FUD factor of GPL is enough to keep most "will code for pay" people away. J. Kilgore David Morris wrote: > > James, > > You can use GPL code in commercial code. You can't morph GPL > code into something that you charge. In other words, you can > tell your customer that they have to download the iSeries-toolkit > but you cannot take a routine in the iSeries-toolkit, change it, and > then charge someone for that changed code. You can submit > your change for inclusion into the original GPL code base. I > copied this to the OSS400 list. > > David Morris >
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.