|
Joe wrote: >... >I can only imagine that the decision was made by some >"compiler experts" who have never worked a single day in an application >development environment. More than likely, it's a group of computer science >academicians who have never programmed a business algorithm in their lives. Which would you prefer? Would you rather have your RPG IV compiler developed by application programmers? Or by compiler experts? >... >Turning RPG into Java is a stupid idea. I agree 100%. Java and RPG IV are still on different continents, functionality-wise, and there are no plans to turn RPG into Java. If you think RPG is moving in that direction, you have no idea what Java is all about. >... >By the way, if I'm wrong about the people who made the decision to can the >MOVE operation, please let me know. I'd love to hear some cogent arguments >about how MOVE is a bad operation that will make application development and >maintenance more difficult. Then I'd like to see why > > eval b = %editc(%dec(a:%len(b):0):'X') > >is better than > > MOVE A B > >Really. Convince me. No. Hans Boldt, ILE RPG Development, IBM Toronto Lab, boldt@ca.ibm.com
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.