|
Just out of curiosity, what would the programmer's EXPLICIT INTENT be if the DDS for the display file was defined as "10Y 0"? How about "10N 0"? Should RPG transform that one to packed? Or maybe you'd like it to be transformed to indicators? On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, R. Bruce Hoffman, Jr. wrote: > > Since when (yeah, I know, it's historical) is it acceptable that a compiler > change the EXPLICIT INTENT of the programmer writing the code. Since when is > it a good idea to declare the same damn variable twice, in two different > sources, just to have the variable retain it's original declaration? Why do > we spend good money creating free format stuff to help increase obscurity > and leave little things like this that continue to bite programmers in the > ass? >
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.