|
> you must have had a different machine than me... <VBG> > No, the choice of packed decimal is a 38 thing. Again historical. The 38 had > a decimal processor and performed best with packed decimal arithmetic. And as our good friend John Sears once said: "Rochester couldn't build a fast CPU until they brought in the engineers from Austin". So are Packed Fields still faster performers than say Int's on this new hardware? Bob Cozzi
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.