|
> From: Douglas Handy > > All you need to do is look at your debugging a little different, and > use single-step > mode and/or the INFDS to determine the success of an I/O operation. > > What is so hard about that? As I said in my previous post, single-stepping is not always effective and adding an INFDS to every program is outrageous. Besides that, I don't think I should have to change how I develop code in order to handle merely syntactical changes, which is all the BIF is. The BIF adds no real additional function, it's simply a different way to code the same operation. IBM wants me to use this same syntax, yet I have to change how I do things in order to use it. Since it's not really a serious problem TODAY, this tends towards the "zealotry" category, so I'll stop here. Part of the reason this is such a sore point with me is because IBM are particularly guilty of this in their Java implementation. Implementation decisions have caused code that worked flawlessly in one release to break simply by upgrading to the next release, and have in some cases required some serious changes in order to work around issues. But if IBM continues with this trend of releases breaking existing code, then there will be long term ramifications.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.