|
That is a little elitist isn't it. Thanks, Mark Mark Walter Sr. Programmer/Analyst Hanover Wire Cloth a div of CCX, Inc. mwalter@hanoverwire.com http://www.hanoverwire.com 717.637.3795 Ext.3040 "Njal Fisketjon" <n.f@figu.no> To: <rpg400-l@midrange.com> Sent by: cc: rpg400-l-admin@mi Subject: RE: Cycle Processing vs. Doing it my way drange.com 12/07/01 01:43 PM Please respond to rpg400-l Douglas Handy wrote: > Just to play Devil's Advocate here, the same argument can be > alledged against > using pointers, or most APIs, or service programs with binding > directories, or > ... (name your favorite new RPG IV feature here). I agree with Jon. "Any" Windows programmer knows the concept of pointers, API ("Win API"), service programs (DLL-s), which makes it fairly ease to understand an ILE RPG program. <flame bait> A cycle processing program is nothing more than a relic from the old age of punch cards and should be left in the "back of your minds" together with left hand indicators, TAG, CABxx and GOTO! </flame bait> _______________________________________________ This is the RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries (RPG400-L) mailing list To post a message email: RPG400-L@midrange.com To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/rpg400-l or email: RPG400-L-request@midrange.com Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.