|
Sounds like you've got another variable that you're overflowing. Usually due to pointer or parameter logic being wrong. If you need more help, you'll have to post the code. On Tue, 23 Oct 2001, Reeve Fritchman wrote: > > I’m using a timestamp (type “Z”) field with INZ(*SYS) to stamp added > records. > > Somewhere in the program (my debug Watch says it happens when I CHECKR on a > completely different field) the timestamp becomes garbage and ends up > looking like this: ’01-10- 23-10.16.42.927000’ instead of > ‘2001-10-23-10.16.42.927000’ > > This is a production program. > > Has anybody else experienced this problem? > > Thanks, > rf
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.