× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
I’m using a timestamp (type “Z”) field with INZ(*SYS) to stamp added
records.

Somewhere in the program (my debug Watch says it happens when I CHECKR on a
completely different field) the timestamp becomes garbage and ends up
looking like this: ’01-10-  23-10.16.42.927000’ instead of
‘2001-10-23-10.16.42.927000’

This is a production program.

Has anybody else experienced this problem?

Thanks,
rf
--



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.