|
The Original Program Model (i.e., the RPG III runtime environment) was very efficient compared to ILE (the Integrated Language Environment) when running on the old AS/400 CISC boxes. Even the original RISC boxes didn't offer much in the way of performance for ILE-based programs. On the PowerPC boxes and today's new iSeries systems, ILE programs are as good or better than OPM programs in perceived performance. Whether or not they are more efficient is something the compiler writers would have to answer. RPG III only targets the OPM environment. RPG IV only targets the ILE environment, but also has an OPM compatibility mode in the DFTACTGRP(*YES) parameter. If you have relatively new hardware or any iSeries box, the you won't see a performance loose in moving to RPG IV. Even with the addition of activation groups, unless you have an overloaded system you will see, I believe, an overall improvement in performance and greater programmer productivity. Bob Cozzi cozzi@rpgiv.com Visit the new on-line iSeries Forums at: http://www.rpgiv.com/forum > -----Original Message----- > From: rpg400-l-admin@midrange.com [mailto:rpg400-l-admin@midrange.com] On > Behalf Of Andrew.Lutz@abbott.com > Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 10:19 AM > To: rpg400-l@midrange.com > Subject: Re: Permormance question? > > > OPM or (RPG as you call it) is a simulated environment > > just as S36 is a simulated environment > > RPGILE is 'native' environment > > I would think the native will run faster. > > Will you be using bound calls? That will be significantly faster. > > > > > > Gurrieri Fabrizio > <fabrizio.gurrieri@bar To: RPG400- > L@midrange.com > tolini.it> cc: > Sent by: Subject: Permormance > question? > rpg400-l-admin@midrang > e.com > > > 08/23/2001 09:29 AM > Please respond to > rpg400-l > > > > > > > This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand > this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. > -- > [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] > Hi, I've an RPG program that is call in the our most frequently use > interactive program that's why its performances cover a notable importance. > Well, I've to modify it and I think to convert it into an RPGILE program but > someone told me that an RPGILE *PGM run more slowly and need more memory > than an RPG *PGM. > It's true? > > Thanks a lot. > > Fabrizio Gurrieri > ITALY - Bologna > > _______________________________________________ > This is the RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries (RPG400-L) mailing list > To post a message email: RPG400-L@midrange.com > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, > visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/rpg400-l > or email: RPG400-L-request@midrange.com > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > This is the RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries (RPG400-L) mailing list > To post a message email: RPG400-L@midrange.com > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, > visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/rpg400-l > or email: RPG400-L-request@midrange.com
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.