|
>But with a subprocedure you gain speed, ease of use, and are able to group >your procedures into "libraries" or service programs. > >Also, Calling a program you cannot return a value and simulate a BIF as you >can with subprocedures, which makes code much more readable. Agreed. But I would question ‘gaining speed’. Assuming subprocedure is 10 times faster than a dynamic program CALL then a 10-nanosecond program call becomes 1 nanosecond in subprocedure call. This change is not noticeable in interactive applications and in most batch applications where the same program is call for, say, only a few thousand times. Besides, if we exclude the time spent on resolving calling procedure/program, the execution time may be the same for both. This means that a 10-second run program will only become a 9.99-sencond run procedure. Regards. +--- | This is the RPG/400 Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.