|
----- Original Message ----- From: "Stone, Brad V (TC)" <bvstone@taylorcorp.com> To: <RPG400-L@midrange.com> Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 9:35 AM Subject: Standards and Egos (was RE: ILE Propoganda) > > Standards are always changing. Let's assume a shop doesn't use ILE. If > someone starts using it, writing functions, etc, for a "proof of concept" is > that bad, or good? (none of this "if they go off on their own it is!" crap > either, let's assume the proper channels are taken.) > ------------------ Oh how true. I once did some work for a S/38 shop that had "converted" Cobol programmers. Their standards were basically to use RPG but write it like Cobol (ie open/close all files manually, code level breaks - don't use I-spec level indicators, ....). They were rewriting some programs to get the work done in less time. On one of the programs that I was asked to write (new program), the manager asked me how I was going to write it. After giving an overview, he said that he felt that if I had my preferences, I would do something differently. I said that there was, and he asked what that would be. I suggested using matching records (this was a simple file merge program). He said that because this was a one-time program and that they were looking at ways to make their programs more efficent, that I should write it with matching records. I did and he copied the program and modified it to perform the match in-line. He came in early one morning and ran both versions of the programs (in test environment) several times. My program ran in 1/3 the time of his. When I came in that day, he called me in and asked me to explain matching record logic and some other RPG "features" that they had avoided. He remarked that if they could get that kind of performance increase, that they needed to look at using some of them (ie change their standards). I know for many RPG matching records is hard to understand, but I this situation it was the best "tool" to use, and I'm not wanting to start a discussion on the pros and cons. My point is that a shop looked at its standards and was open to changing them once a "proof of concept" showed that there may be a good reason to change them. _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com +--- | This is the RPG/400 Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.