Re: Speed of SETLL/GT vs CHAIN -- RPG400-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

I believe there is no difference if a record is NOT found
between a Chain and a SetLL, but if a record is found the
Chain pulls in the data while the SetLL only sets the file
pointer.

As far as which is faster between a Chain vs. SetLL/ReadE
when a record is found. I believe they are the same  or any
difference is too minimal to be concerned about.

> > Made a bet saying CHAIN is faster that SETLL & a READE.
> > But, would the gurus out there please clarify if the
> actual time for a
> SETLL is
> > faster than CHAIN.

Patrick Conner
www.ConnecTown.com
(828) 244-0822
+---
| This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.