× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: Re: MODS in subprocedures
  • From: "Peter Dow" <pcdow@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 9 May 2001 14:20:40 -0700

Hi Jon,

While you're at it, I'd like to add a question or two<g>.

Since Phil is returning a recordset, presumably with a variable number of
records, what's the preferred method of doing so?

Seems like the first program would have to figure out how many records it's
going to get, or the max it wants returned, then allocate memory for the
MODS to hold them and pass the pointer to the MODS to the procedure, along
with the max number of records (unless there's a way for the procedure to
figure out how big the MODS is).

I haven't had to do anything like this yet, but it sounds interesting.

Curious,
Peter Dow
Dow Software Services, Inc.
909 425-0194 voice
909 425-0196 fax



----- Original Message -----
From: "Phil" <sublime78ska@yahoo.com>
To: <RPG400-L@midrange.com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 1:31 PM
Subject: RE: MODS in subprocedures


> Jon,
>
> What I am passing back is a result set of records.  Usually I define it as
> an external ds.  I just kept my example simple which I shouldn't have
done.
> Sorry for the confusion
>
> I know if I define the pointer outside of the subprocedure that it will
work
> and I understand why (I understood that before but somehow didn't see what
I
> did wrong).  I now understand also that if I define the pointer as static
> that I can define it within the subprocedure.
>
> What I am working on understanding now is the merits between passing the
> pointer to the subprocedure versus returning the pointer to the calling
> subprocedure.  For that matter, what are the merits of using a return
> argument at all?
>
> Phil
>
>
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
>
> +---
> | This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
> | To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
> | To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
> | To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
> | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator:
david@midrange.com
> +---


_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

+---
| This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.