× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: Re: Variable length MODS
  • From: "Peter Dow" <pcdow@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2001 18:20:47 -0700

Hi James,

I believe the compiler puts in upper boundary checking based on what you
enter as the dimensions or occurrences of the array or data structure, i.e.
no relation  to the pointer. In the example I gave Tom, there's an array
with a DIM(9999).  If only enough memory is allocated for 3 array entries,
what happens when he references entry 4?  As far as the compiler is
concerned, 4 is well within the defined upper boundary of 9999, but in fact
no memory has been allocated for that entry and it moves into uncharted
territory, but does not (as far as I know) give an error.

Regards,
Peter Dow
Dow Software Services, Inc.
909 425-0194 voice
909 425-0196 fax

----- Original Message -----
From: "James David Rich" <james@eaerich.com>
To: <RPG400-L@midrange.com>
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2001 3:01 PM
Subject: Re: Variable length MODS


> On Fri, 13 Apr 2001, Peter Dow wrote:
>
> > Hi Tom,
> >
> > As far as I know, you'd get weird data, with no array bounds error,
> > because as far as the compiler knows, the upper array boundary (in my
> > example) is 9999. In other words, yes, you have to be careful how you
> > use it, and check the NumLabels or whatever instead of the %elem(array)
> > test.
>
> If a pointer is used shouldn't there be *no* upper boundary? Just alloc
> and it keeps growing.
>
> James Rich
> james@eaerich.com
>
> +---
> | This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
> | To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
> | To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
> | To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
> | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator:
david@midrange.com
> +---

+---
| This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.