× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: Re: Variable length MODS
  • From: James David Rich <james@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2001 16:01:50 -0600 (MDT)

On Fri, 13 Apr 2001, Peter Dow wrote:

> Hi Tom,
>
> As far as I know, you'd get weird data, with no array bounds error,
> because as far as the compiler knows, the upper array boundary (in my
> example) is 9999. In other words, yes, you have to be careful how you
> use it, and check the NumLabels or whatever instead of the %elem(array)
> test.

If a pointer is used shouldn't there be *no* upper boundary? Just alloc
and it keeps growing.

James Rich
james@eaerich.com

+---
| This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.