|
No, it would take it with the VALUE keyword as well. > -----Original Message----- > From: Jon.Paris@hal.it [mailto:Jon.Paris@hal.it] > Sent: Monday, February 26, 2001 9:54 PM > To: RPG400-L@midrange.com > Subject: Re: CEETSTA > > > > >> callp chkParm(exists:2:*OMIT) > > Phil - I don't see how you could have called it like this - > without the > CONST keyword on the proto surely the compiler would reject > the "2" parm in > the CallP. I > > +--- > | This is the RPG/400 Mailing List! > | To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com. > | To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com. > | To unsubscribe from this list send email to > RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. > | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: > david@midrange.com > +--- > +--- | This is the RPG/400 Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.