RE: RPG and SQL Compilers

David Wright wrote:

>I am all for new functions, etc...  But I do not like adding redundancy...
>So far I have not seen any reason to add something like +=.  The existing
>functionality is just as easy, and IMO more readable anyhow...

I don't think that adding += was crucial to those who voted for it - it was
cheap.
On the other hand, am I the only one who voted for full Null support?
And I wish, oh I wish for full operational descriptor support, but I
understand that this one belongs to Rochester, so Mr Farr can't spend my
money for it even if he wants to.

And Jon, I understand about different divisions, but I sort of hoped that
there was a Big Cheese somewhere in IBM who could tell squabblers to "play
nice."  Ah, well.

Buck Calabro
Aptis; Albany, NY
"Nothing is so firmly believed as
 that which we least know" -- Michel Montaigne
Visit the Midrange archives at http://www.midrange.com
+---
| This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---