|
On Wed, 15 Nov 2000 boldt@ca.ibm.com wrote: > >So it still falls in the camp of something I wouldn't vote to > >spend very much of my next $100 towards. But presuming it is > >cheap, add it to the proposed enhancement list. > > Looking at the MI built-ins, I can see definite advantages to > native RPG syntax for bit operations, so I'll keep it in the > draft poll. Since now more people lean towards the BIF syntax, > that will be the choice in the poll. > > Cheers! Hans > > Hans Boldt, ILE RPG Development, IBM Toronto Lab, boldt@ca.ibm.com > Hi... Just out of curiosity, how much work would it be to add these BIFs into the compiler? From my point of view (keeping in mind that I've never written a compiler) they seem like one of the more basic things that a computer can do... Thanks +--- | This is the RPG/400 Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact copyright@midrange.com.
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.