|
In a message dated Tue, 14 Nov 2000 14:18:35 , boldt@ca.ibm.com writes: > This begs the question: What syntax would you prefer for bitwise > operations? > > a) infix operators: > x ANDB y > x ORB y > x XORB y > NOTB y > > (&& and || (like in C) are problematical for us since '|' is > not in the invariant EBCDIC code page.) > > b) built-in functions: > %BITAND(x:y) > %BITOR(x:y) > %BITXOR(x:y) > %BITNOT(x) > > Cheers! Hans bifs! +--- | This is the RPG/400 Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.