× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: Re: Z-ADD or Eval?
  • From: Scott Klement <klemscot@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2000 15:44:28 -0500 (CDT)


Ummm...  why would Z-Add be more efficient than MOVE? That seems odd to
me.  Math is slower than just moving bytes around...
 
Your code doesn't look modern to me because it uses an indicator :)
You should find a way to do this that doesn't involve an indicator.

If you're only doing a single line of code (as in your examples) I find
conditioning indicators to be just as good as if statements.  But, if
you're going to do more than one line of code conditioned on that same
indicator, the "if" technique is better.

This is how I code things like that, when I _must_ use indicators:

c   99              eval       EqSize = 0                         

or:
      
c                   if         *in99                                    
c                   eval       EqSize = 0                               
c                   endif                                               

I doubt I'll ever use Z-ADD again.  :)


On Tue, 22 Aug 2000, Jim Langston wrote:

> I am trying to use all Evals in my programming just because it is much easier 
>to read and understand.
> 
> My question is, however, should I be converting Z-ADDs to Evals?  I 
>understand we use(d) Z-ADD
> instead of MOVE because Z-ADD was more effiecient.  We could of used MOVE, 
>but we used Z-ADD.
> Now, if I have a statement (and I do):
> 
>       C   99              Z-ADD     *ZERO         EQSIZE
> 
> and I want to convert this to "modern" programming, should it become:
> 
>       C                   If       *IN99
>       C                   Z-Add     *Zero         EqSize
>       C                   EndIf
> 
> or should it become:
> 
>       C                   If       *IN99
>       C                   Eval      EqSize = *Zero
>       C                   EndIf
> 
> Any comments on this are appreciated.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Jim Langston
> 

+---
| This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.